Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:18:54 +0200
From:      Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>
To:        Eirik =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8verby?= <ltning@anduin.net>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4?
Message-ID:  <20050620151854.GA41619@stack.nl>
In-Reply-To: <A9D88C9D-B3F4-4FD3-A210-06A59EA15787@anduin.net>
References:  <A9D88C9D-B3F4-4FD3-A210-06A59EA15787@anduin.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Eirik verby wrote:
> I know enough not to call this a "confirmation", but disabling =20
> dummynet did indeed allow me to finish the backup. I never made it =20
> past 15GBs before, now the full 19GB tar.gz file is done, and the =20
> boxes are both still running. The funny thing is - I only disabled =20
> dummynet on one of the boxes now - the source of the backup, the box =20
> that pushes data. The other box has pretty much 100% the same setup, =20
> and is also i386. But as traffic shaping can only happen on outgoing =20
> packets, I suppose that makes sense.

Hmm, does that solve kern/79208 for you as well by any chance ?

Marc

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCtt5eezjnobFOgrERAsXHAJ9pk5mS42whT7zVcNDfmrI6AnWncACfcKHv
jfOmVW0LKbz9WW1b/2qh0f4=
=sXsW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050620151854.GA41619>