Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:18:54 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> To: Eirik =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8verby?= <ltning@anduin.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: NFS-related hang in 5.4? Message-ID: <20050620151854.GA41619@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <A9D88C9D-B3F4-4FD3-A210-06A59EA15787@anduin.net> References: <A9D88C9D-B3F4-4FD3-A210-06A59EA15787@anduin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:53:19AM +0200, Eirik verby wrote: > I know enough not to call this a "confirmation", but disabling =20 > dummynet did indeed allow me to finish the backup. I never made it =20 > past 15GBs before, now the full 19GB tar.gz file is done, and the =20 > boxes are both still running. The funny thing is - I only disabled =20 > dummynet on one of the boxes now - the source of the backup, the box =20 > that pushes data. The other box has pretty much 100% the same setup, =20 > and is also i386. But as traffic shaping can only happen on outgoing =20 > packets, I suppose that makes sense. Hmm, does that solve kern/79208 for you as well by any chance ? Marc --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCtt5eezjnobFOgrERAsXHAJ9pk5mS42whT7zVcNDfmrI6AnWncACfcKHv jfOmVW0LKbz9WW1b/2qh0f4= =sXsW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050620151854.GA41619>