Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:20:39 +0000 (UTC) From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r190323 - head/sys/netipsec Message-ID: <200903231620.n2NGKdfg014396@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: vanhu Date: Mon Mar 23 16:20:39 2009 New Revision: 190323 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/190323 Log: Fixed comments so it stays in 80 chars by line with hard tabs of 8 chars.... Approved by: gnn(mentor) Modified: head/sys/netipsec/key.c Modified: head/sys/netipsec/key.c ============================================================================== --- head/sys/netipsec/key.c Mon Mar 23 14:54:01 2009 (r190322) +++ head/sys/netipsec/key.c Mon Mar 23 16:20:39 2009 (r190323) @@ -4162,11 +4162,15 @@ key_flush_sad(time_t now) now - sav->created > sav->lft_s->addtime) { key_sa_chgstate(sav, SADB_SASTATE_DYING); /* - * Actually, only send expire message if SA has been used, as it - * was done before, but should we always send such message, and let IKE - * daemon decide if it should be renegotiated or not ? - * XXX expire message will actually NOT be sent if SA is only used - * after soft lifetime has been reached, see below (DYING state) + * Actually, only send expire message if + * SA has been used, as it was done before, + * but should we always send such message, + * and let IKE daemon decide if it should be + * renegotiated or not ? + * XXX expire message will actually NOT be + * sent if SA is only used after soft + * lifetime has been reached, see below + * (DYING state) */ if (sav->lft_c->usetime != 0) key_expire(sav);
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200903231620.n2NGKdfg014396>