Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:      David Kirchner <dpk@parodius.com>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Strange procfs bug(?) 3.2-RELEASE
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009181026240.51752-100000@pentarou.parodius.com>
In-Reply-To: <20000911130912.N12231@fw.wintelcom.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Does anyone know if the patch indicated below was committed to fix this
FreeBSD 3.2 bug? I can't upgrade to a later release yet, but if this patch
is it, I can hack it in.

On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> * David Kirchner <dpk@parodius.com> [000911 12:19] wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, there's a problem with procfs in 3.2 when you stress it heavily
> > > like that, my suggestion is to get 4-stable running, or at least try
> > > to get 3.5.1 up and running, but I'm unsure if it's fixed in 3.5.1.
> > > 
> > > -Alfred
> > 
> > Is this related? :
> > 
> > "Don't call calcru() on a swapped-out process. calcru() access p_stats,
> > which is in U-area."
> > 
> > That's from CVSweb at file procfs_status.c, revision 1.14
> 
> I'm not really a procfs guru, I only know about your reported problem,
> I've never heard of that message though.
> 
> -- 
> -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
> "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009181026240.51752-100000>