Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 09:45:57 -0500 (EST) From: Pedro Giffuni <m230761@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: ache@nagual.ru, imp@village.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Niklas Hallqvist: archivers/hpack.non-usa.only Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.970108093549.1846B-100000@ingenieria.ingsala.unal.edu.co> In-Reply-To: <199701080747.XAA11117@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 7 Jan 1997, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * I disagree with this (proposed) way of patching: as clearly stated on "the > * porting guidelines", there is a common way to identify BSD4.4, if there are > * bla, bla bla...(I wrote it..) > > I agree with this in principle. If it can be differentiated by the > BSD macro, it should be used instead of __FreeBSD__ and/or > __OpenBSD__. > I was thinking on replacing (on all our port tree) #ifdef __FreeBSD__ for: #if (defined(BSD) && (BSD >= 199306)) /*BSD 4.4*/ And let the OpenBSD guys report their specific patches. I asume they will want to mirror our master site and they will have a ports master(?). Pedro. > > Well, I'm going to quit here. But boy, this code is ugly. > > Satoshi >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.91.970108093549.1846B-100000>