Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 23:35:29 +0200 From: Alex RAY <ray@ddteam.net> To: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> Cc: Alexandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua>, geom@freebsd.org, embedded@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM_ULZMA Message-ID: <20100302233529.77625a5a.ray@ddteam.net> In-Reply-To: <4B8D67C4.9050709@andric.com> References: <20100219163644.da89e882.ray@dlink.ua> <20100302071736.GF1946@garage.freebsd.pl> <20100302104748.0f27136c.ray@dlink.ua> <4B8D67C4.9050709@andric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:32:20 +0100 Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> wrote: > On 2010-03-02 09:47, Alexandr Rybalko wrote: > >>> Definiatelly separately, not sure where. There is ongoing discussion > >>> somwhere on importing this algorithm to the base for tar(1) to use, it > >>> would be best to have only one copy of code in the tree. > > I have already said, that it would be good for embedded platforms have only one copy of the code for the kernel and userland. > > It is not thought of how done it. > > I think Pawel means the *source* code in this case, not the executable > code. E.g. lzma source should most likely go under /usr/src/contrib, > and be built separately for kernel and userland. I understand. I'm trying to think about the future of FreeBSD in embedded. :) -- Alexandr Rybalko <ray@dlink.ua> aka Alex RAY <ray@ddteam.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100302233529.77625a5a.ray>