Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 17:38:45 +0100 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?q?Apestegu=EDa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Gnome slow at start up Message-ID: <200812051738.46248.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <1bd550a00812050823nf1a79b2g2f4419cf79b50538@mail.gmail.com> References: <1bd550a00812041051safe005bj8ee50bdf97583ae3@mail.gmail.com> <200812050558.05907.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <1bd550a00812050823nf1a79b2g2f4419cf79b50538@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 05 December 2008 17:23:10 Fernando Apestegu=EDa wrote: > > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3D445 > > Hi Mel, thanks a lot. > > The --purge-delay=3D5000 and --warn-delay=3D5000 options for gnome-session > fixed the problem. > > However, this triggers another question. Since these options decrease > the default timeouts (30000) for clients to connect and clients to > respond respectively, doesn't this mean some process, acting like a > gnome client is stalled or taking too much time to initialize? > > Does this worth a PR? Definitely worth a PR or at least gather commonalities in that forum thread= ,=20 cause it happens on different releases and seemingly vanilla systems. I don't use gnome, so can't help there. Maybe move it over to the gnome list. =2D-=20 Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812051738.46248.fbsd.questions>