Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:21:27 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> To: Dirk GOUDERS <hank@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de> Cc: Eric Ogren <eogren@earthlink.net>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Removing 2.X entries from FAQ? Message-ID: <44254.958029687@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 May 2000 08:15:01 %2B0200." <200005110615.IAA16382@musashi.et.bocholt.fh-ge.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, 11 May 2000 08:15:01 +0200, Dirk GOUDERS wrote: > Hmm, while having read your posting, I was asking myself, if it would > be useful, if the different releases include their own FAQ - only > relevant for that particular release... > I'm not sure if that subject has already been discussed, some time > ago. It has and it was unanimously decided by all (except for a few who don't actually contribute anything) that it's too much work, given that most frequently asked questions relate to more than one release. I agree that ancient, crusty questions should either be removed (reducing the signal-to-noise ratio of the FAQ) or relegated to a "legacy FAQ". Either one takes work, although this work can be undertaken incremenetally, as individuals notice crusty questions. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the messagehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44254.958029687>
