Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:30:08 -0800 From: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Ding=E9?= <raphael.dinge@ohmforce.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: X over ethernet is too much slow... Message-ID: <D216B8F8-10BF-11D7-86CE-003065715DA8@pursued-with.net> In-Reply-To: <27AF90DA-10BA-11D7-961E-00039312D14E@ohmforce.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sunday, Dec 15, 2002, at 21:49 US/Pacific, Raphaël Dingé wrote: > I've been using another configuration where I switched from ssh to a > complete xdcmp system. > Loading of pictures is very faster now, in rt2_demo it is quick, so in > normal desktop environment it is quite perfect. > > I found that increasing sendspace & rscvspace for tcp in sysctl.conf > did not change anything, and my thought is that it's got something to > be with udp/tcp. > > Any thoughts on what could affect X performance so much with tcp ? > Did I misconfigured something ? X is subject to bad coding. If one of the elements on your desktop is set to update, say, 100 times/second, it can seriously affect overall refresh rates. You may need to take a protocol analyzer to the link to establish what's really going on in the conversation. Hacking around in the ethernet settings isn't liable to buy you much in your scenario. KeS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D216B8F8-10BF-11D7-86CE-003065715DA8>