Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:58:38 -0500 From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding functionality to a port Message-ID: <34fd4a6a-87a7-b1a5-385b-5c1dab767560@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <bc50a61a-1341-0c70-c427-f1717e2d871a@FreeBSD.org> References: <4ca51765-b556-3f12-5809-5aadbf6dccca@ohreally.nl> <YZEskkPi2%2BcX9hrZ@home.opsec.eu> <480b44f5-0674-e645-8413-a1a368cfc393@ohreally.nl> <YZExLlXP3uEjrvyF@fc.opsec.eu> <fb5e514d-1458-9b49-1882-b64d5386cdfa@madpilot.net> <YZFGCoblQOHPnPWe@fc.opsec.eu> <e07b5a48-3465-c92b-ee4b-f2fc91e0202f@madpilot.net> <YZFXby/ktthO9Khx@fc.opsec.eu> <bc50a61a-1341-0c70-c427-f1717e2d871a@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/14/21 13:42, Guido Falsi wrote: > [...] > As I stated in another (provate message) I just realized that this is at > least partly covered by "POLA". [...] Perhaps I'm naïve, but to me the Principle of Least Amazement really does completely cover the issues being raised here. Is it necessary to complicate the situation any more than that? -- George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34fd4a6a-87a7-b1a5-385b-5c1dab767560>