Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:28:57 +0000
From:      Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org>
To:        Dag-Erling =?unknown-8bit?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: usb devices and devfs settings
Message-ID:  <20040214002857.GB7396@trit.org>
In-Reply-To: <xzp1xozhsx4.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References:  <20040213113134.GA11021@gvr.gvr.org> <xzpn07nawqu.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040213144338.GA13380@gvr.gvr.org> <xzpad3nhtfv.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040213154946.GA14227@gvr.gvr.org> <xzp1xozhsx4.fsf@dwp.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
> Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> writes:
> > IMHO all that is needed is a rewrite of devfs.conf to the ruleset approach
> > and rewrite /etc/rc.d/devfs to apply that ruleset. Correct?
> 
> There is already code in /etc/rc.subr and /etc/rc.d/devfs to load and
> apply rulesets, but it is undocumented.
> 
> You should probably try to add an option to devfs(8) to have it read
> an entire ruleset from a file

I've been out of the loop for a while, but devfs(8) has always been
able to read a ruleset from a file:

	devfs rule -s 10 add - < yourfile

This can't be used to read *multiple* rulesets from one file, but I
think it's better to have one file per ruleset anyway.  Non-"add"
commands might need their own syntax, though.

> (like ipfw does);

ipfw(8) doesn't actually read from a file; rc.firewall calls ${fwcmd}
explicitly for each rule.  devfs(8) easily supports this model.

Dima.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040214002857.GB7396>