Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 1 Nov 2013 17:15:32 -0500
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
To:        Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: this breaks builds of head on stable/9 (Re: svn commit: r257268 - head/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld
Message-ID:  <20131101221532.GA45336@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
In-Reply-To: <20131101213254.GA35505@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
References:  <CA%2BhQ2%2Bh3LA%2Buk6RQg5a6QHAEedEZPZ=RUbLCZ1ZqFvNNi3EAAg@mail.gmail.com> <20131101020924.GB32951@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20131101061842.GA8911@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20131101204848.GA44088@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20131101213254.GA35505@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 10:32:54PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:48:48PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 07:18:42AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> ...
> > > ok so what happens is the following (trying to build HEAD on 9.2, bot=
h amd64)
> > >=20
> > > - WITHOUT_CLANG and related options:
> > >     "make toolchain"	fails with the error on krb5
> > >     "make buildworld"	works, and a subsequent
> > > 				"make toolchain" also works
> > >=20
> > > - without options (so compiling CLANG)
> > >=20
> > >     "make toolchain"	fails with the error below
> > >=20
> > >     building shared library libc.so.7
> > >     /usr/bin/ld: this linker was not configured to use sysroots
> > >     cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see =
invocation)
> > >     *** [libc.so.7] Error code 1
> > >     1 error
> > >     *** [all] Error code 2
> > >     1 error
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > "make toolchain" on an empty tree used to work until before this comm=
it,
> > > and does work if i revert this single change
> > >=20
> > > So does this mean that 'toolchain' now has some prerequisites ?
> >=20
> > I think I've found it.  I tried the last one first since it was the most
> > bizzare and about 40 lines up there was fairly obvious error output that
> > told me what was wrong.  The issue is that the :U modifer I used is a
> > bmake feature and that the toolchain target doesn't bootstrap bmake (or
> > perhaps doesn't do it early enough).  I plan to commit a workaround for
> > this particular case, but we probably need to alter the toolchain and
> > kernel-toolchain targets to bootstrap bmake on older systems or we'll
> > run into this again with some future change somewhere else.
>=20
> yes, bootstrapping bmake early seems a future-proof way to handle this.

I've committed a workaround for HEAD that I'll MFC soon on the basis
that we in theory have infrastructure to support WITHOUT_BMAKE.
(In practice WITHOUT_BMAKE is broken and corrupts your object tree with a
make that fails until manually deleted.)  We should decide if it should
be fixed or removed before 10 goes out.

-- Brooks

--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFSdCgDXY6L6fI4GtQRAvDXAKCkZxL0EQcEOxqQvSO7b10wumtomwCfSaUw
kgz/yVP/BsEQScrPrcMidsY=
=pXvM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131101221532.GA45336>