Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:56:33 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251626] math/py-numpy: Update to 1.20.3 (compatible with Python 3.9) Message-ID: <bug-251626-21822-VpsOcQtMsh@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251626-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251626-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251626 --- Comment #41 from Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #40) There is many points in your comment. For what I'm concerned with: - the proposed patch (the latest, of course) is OK for the ports I tested, = but of course I have not tested all of them, and an exp-run is necessary (you a= sked Antoine to stop it) - for what I'm seeing, most ports are limiting to a version unnecessarily, = just because they have not been tested with a higher version. If we remove shared macros for ports like numpy, it means that we must support several versions= of these ports, like py-numpy-legacy and py-numpy, without conflicts. - I do not see any value in auto-plist, excepted lazy-porting, but if you w= ant it, just do it, you are the maintainer. I have not been able to make it work with autoplist, this is why I have generated a static one. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251626-21822-VpsOcQtMsh>