Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:57:13 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: John Mehr <jcm@visi.com> Cc: Michael Ross <gmx@ross.cx>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303121953580.64633@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <web-11149903@mailback3.g2host.com> References: <web-11636850@mailback4.g2host.com> <513E2DA5.70200@mac.com> <web-12282796@mailback4.g2host.com> <op.wts7cnaeg7njmm@michael-think> <web-11149903@mailback3.g2host.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, John Mehr wrote: > On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 02:20:37 +0100 > "Michael Ross" <gmx@ross.cx> wrote: >> >> What'd you think about a syntax extension along the lines of >> >> svnup --bsd-base >> svnup --bsd-ports >> svnup --bsd-all >> >> with automagic host selection, default to uname's major version stable >> branch and default target dirs? > > Hello, > > This sounds good to me, and as long as there's some sort of a consensus that > we're not breaking the principle of least surprise, I'm all for it. The one > default that may be unexpected is the defaulting to the stable branch -- > people who track the security branches will be left out. So maybe something > like: > > svnup --ports > svnup --stable > svnup --security (or --release) How would you select the mirror? There are two now, and likely more later.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1303121953580.64633>