Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:46:10 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: pjd@freebsd.org Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/amd64 mp_machdep.c src/sys/i386/i386 mp_machdep.c Message-ID: <20050513.114610.28861585.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20050513123909.GW837@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <200505130057.j4D0v4ZB025346@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050513123909.GW837@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20050513123909.GW837@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> writes:
: On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 12:57:04AM +0000, Jacques Vidrine wrote:
: +> nectar 2005-05-13 00:57:04 UTC
: +>
: +> FreeBSD src repository
: +>
: +> Modified files:
: +> sys/amd64/amd64 mp_machdep.c
: +> sys/i386/i386 mp_machdep.c
: +> Log:
: +> Default hyperthreading on in -CURRENT. No seatbelts in CURRENT (^_^)
:
: Are we sure people don't use 6-CURRENT in production for some purposes?
: I don't disagree about keeping HTT enable in -CURRENT, but maybe we want
: at least print a warning on boot or something.
Yes. If you based a production system off of CURRENT, you are assumed
to know what you are doing.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050513.114610.28861585.imp>