Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 10:53:20 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> Cc: "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@peorth.iteration.net>, Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RANDOMDEV inspired realitycheck regarding i386/i486... Message-ID: <200012081753.KAA14232@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Dec 2000 06:20:20 PST." <200012081420.eB8EKfN82161@cwsys.cwsent.com> References: <200012081420.eB8EKfN82161@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200012081420.eB8EKfN82161@cwsys.cwsent.com> Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group writes: : > I do not really think the latest XFree86 versions were designed : > with running 386/486 in mind. 386/486 is still a market, but : > not many people try to build an embedded system with a full X : > and tools. : : Interesting. At home I use a 486DX33 as an X terminal. As long as I : run all of my X clients, including the window manager on my server, a : P120, performance is quite accetable. We run X on our embedded product on 486 class machines. It still works fairly well. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012081753.KAA14232>