Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Apr 1996 11:19:47 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Robert Withrow <witr@rwwa.com>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: GNU binutils port 
Message-ID:  <199604081719.LAA26093@rover.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 08 Apr 1996 08:49:34 EDT

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
: As you noticed, cross building is a legitimate reason for wanting
: both gcc and binutils to compile on FreeBSD.

gcc builds out of the box for cross compiling on FreeSBD.   Since the
ports are designed to have  just a make done and it works, there is no
need to have gcc as a port.  The reason being that you must do some
manual configuration before the cross compilation will work.  I
thought thte whole point of doing a "port" was to eliminate that.

Also, building a cross compiler can still be a bit of a black art.  It
is best done by hand because there are a number of niggling little
logistical issues that trip up people in the process.

I think that I must be missing something here...

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604081719.LAA26093>