Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Oct 2004 22:09:55 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        spam maps <spamrefuse@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: 5.3: redundant libraries in /usr/lib after cvsup-ing and build world ?
Message-ID:  <20041005190955.GE4568@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20041004064337.19785.qmail@web54010.mail.yahoo.com>
References:  <20041004062112.GC47338@ip.net.ua> <20041004064337.19785.qmail@web54010.mail.yahoo.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 11:43:37PM -0700, spam maps wrote:
> 
> --- Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 10:29:30PM -0700, spam maps
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> > > 
> > > Can I remove all these as well?
> > > 
> > Yes for the above list, but generally one should be
> > careful with removing the .a libraries -- they are
> > installed with -C.
> 
> # ls -i /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> 8710 /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> 8710 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> 
> But:
> 
> # ls -il /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
>   8710 /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> 110872 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 ->
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> 
> However, /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 has an old date, whereas
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 has the date of most recent
> world build.
> 
> Is it still save to remove libexec/ld-elf.so.1 ?
> 
Not because ld-elf.so.1 is needed and installed with -C.

Please don't remove my address when replying, I did not
ask for it.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBYvGDqRfpzJluFF4RAmX4AJ48oBIhK+rv8LCWhtI/vI8A138CNACfZm87
63+gY9X8T1LCPpfkRb/rUPY=
=8KkQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041005190955.GE4568>