Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:04:40 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 273122] lang/python311: backport netlink support Message-ID: <bug-273122-21822-GPHsod23R2@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-273122-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-273122-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273122 --- Comment #15 from Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> --- I am not a member of portmgr@. But I still feel, as a long-time FreeBSD committer, that there is a certain amount of obstructionism going on here that annoys me, in the form of requiring meena to jump through hoops that are brittle IMO. I cannot currently muster the resources to move this, so I will only repeat that this needs to move forward. Make the relevant patches for the FILES/PATCHDIR, mention how they come about as a header before the patchfile itself, and remember that ordering for files/patch-* is implicit by applying them in alphabetical order, so patch-aa and thereabouts would work if the natural order does not work. If - I have not looked at this patch nor other versions again, only at the discussion - patches overlap and one of them is trivial and can be applied later, make it a REINPLACE_CMD to orthogonalize it. But seriously this should happen now, and the patch then applied to all other Python branches that need it, too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-273122-21822-GPHsod23R2>