Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 20:17:23 -0800 From: Neel Natu <neelnatu@gmail.com> To: Matthew Grooms <mgrooms@shrew.net> Cc: FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD Message-ID: <CAFgRE9Go4V12c6=79jGLLmnQoQ8jcjO_3jKHV1XQGuAQQr09-g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFgRE9E99MVrZGknAXg-mNx9juA_whz-xPcWCV5Tj0Lm9v2DsA@mail.gmail.com> References: <154A442D-7814-4618-9AFC-6F9FB3F5DFD3@gmail.com> <5443A89F.8050801@digiware.nl> <B44FDB33-D8AB-4E58-9E9E-5EF8B6452334@gmail.com> <CACpH0MdjL-sCS4%2BJbNYvN=nq7y5yF%2BUeByN=YLxfiWN%2BGX4E-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAFgRE9FXxPPfQyA2Eu09zexf4b0xCch5h07c4iWFbR9qq9DooA@mail.gmail.com> <CACpH0MfZ7odgubmGuo-M=qaZcbf7RmcnZ0xieiGZwDo0wvDhhA@mail.gmail.com> <981D4579-CBD4-46EF-A4E3-4236B3C06EF2@jnielsen.net> <54873552.5000104@shrew.net> <CAFgRE9E99MVrZGknAXg-mNx9juA_whz-xPcWCV5Tj0Lm9v2DsA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Neel Natu <neelnatu@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Matthew, > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Matthew Grooms <mgrooms@shrew.net> wrote: >> On 12/9/2014 11:03 AM, John Nielsen wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 26, 2014, at 4:40 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Neel Natu <neelnatu@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a >>>>>> timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It will be MFCed to 10-STABLE but I don't have a specific time frame in >>>>> mind. >>>>> >>>>> I'll guess that it'll be towards the end of November but can be >>>>> accelerated if someone has a need for this in 10-STABLE sooner. >>>> >>>> >>>> I would be using such a patch as soon as it was available. On a friend's >>>> advice, I upgraded a ZFS server here at home with an AMD 9590 and 32Gig >>>> of >>>> RAM. I'd dearly like to use it to track down the netgraph bug (see my >>>> other recent posts), but it doesn't currently qualify. >>> >>> >>> Ping? I'm also waiting with bated breath for this to be MFCed. :) Thanks >>> for the great work! >>> > > Message received: loud and clear :-) > It took longer than anticipated but AMD/SVM support is now in stable/10. Please sync to r276447 before testing. best Neel >> >> +1. And on a somewhat related note, does the SVM port have equivalent to >> Intel Unrestricted Guest support? From what I understand, that will be >> required for the forthcoming UEFI/CSM ( Legacy BIOS ) as well as other bhyve >> features. > > Yes, it does. > > best > Neel > >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Matthew >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFgRE9Go4V12c6=79jGLLmnQoQ8jcjO_3jKHV1XQGuAQQr09-g>