Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 10:27:39 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com> To: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, FreeBSD-CURRENT Mailing List <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: db 1.85 --> 2.x or 3.x? Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96.1000502102451.50739A-100000@shell-1.enteract.com> In-Reply-To: <v04220802b53497c902d8@[195.238.1.121]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 1:16 PM +0200 2000/5/2, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > Sleepycats license is not FreeBSD compatible :-/ > > I don't understand. Reading > <http://www.sleepycat.com/license.net>, it seems to me that FreeBSD > meets all the necessary requirements. Can someone who understands > the details of the licensing issues either explain the situation to > me, or provide pointers to references that do? FreeBSD meets the license requirements. A non-FreeBSD developed application that used the DB interfaces might not. I don't think it would be a good idea for FreeBSD to do things that make it harder to produce commerical software. David Scheidt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96.1000502102451.50739A-100000>