Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 10:24:10 -0400 From: Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> To: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Cc: Chris Ross <cross+freebsd@distal.com> Subject: Unable to replace drive in raidz1 Message-ID: <5ED5CB56-2E2A-4D83-8CDA-6D6A0719ED19@distal.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello. I have searched the interwebs a bit and seen tell of this and =
others
like it, but I haven=E2=80=99t found a solution.
I have a pool with three 3-disk raidz1 vols. I want to replace the =
disks
in the first vdev with larger disks. I=E2=80=99ve done this before, but =
may=E2=80=99ve
done something wrong here.
I belive I used =E2=80=9Czpool remove tank da3=E2=80=9D, but command =
history doesn=E2=80=99t
have that. I=E2=80=99ve used many commands since I started. I =
might=E2=80=99ve
=E2=80=9Czpool offline=E2=80=9Dd the device. I=E2=80=99m sorry I =
don=E2=80=99t remember the original
command.
Then replaced the disk and rebooted. This of course renumbered the
disks. :-(. But, finding the new/replacement disk (da10), I try to
=E2=80=9Czpool replace tank da3 da10=E2=80=9D.
This always produces:
cannot replace da3 with da10: already in replacing/spare config; wait =
for completion or use 'zpool detach=E2=80=99
Now, I can=E2=80=99t use =E2=80=9Czpool detach=E2=80=9D I=E2=80=99ve =
learned because that doesn=E2=80=99t work
on zraid. And I can=E2=80=99t tell what it _thinks_ is happening. I =
even
Did a scrub of the pool and let that finish, but am still seeing the
same.
I have now:
=E2=80=948<=E2=80=948<=E2=80=948<---
>>>>>> zpool status -v tank
pool: tank
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices are faulted in response to persistent =
errors.
Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning =
in a
degraded state.
action: Replace the faulted device, or use 'zpool clear' to mark the =
device
repaired.
scan: scrub repaired 0B in 17:14:03 with 0 errors on Fri Sep 6 =
09:08:34 2024
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tank DEGRADED 0 0 0
raidz1-0 DEGRADED 0 0 0
da3 FAULTED 0 0 0 external =
device fault
da1 ONLINE 0 0 0
da2 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
diskid/DISK-K1GMBN9D ONLINE 0 0 0
diskid/DISK-K1GMEDMD ONLINE 0 0 0
diskid/DISK-K1GMAX1D ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1-2 ONLINE 0 0 0
diskid/DISK-3WJDHJ2J ONLINE 0 0 0
diskid/DISK-3WK3G1KJ ONLINE 0 0 0
diskid/DISK-3WJ7ZMMJ ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
=E2=80=948<=E2=80=948<=E2=80=948<=E2=80=94
I=E2=80=99ll note that before the switcharoo, the second and third =
vdev=E2=80=99s listed
=E2=80=9Cda4 da5 da6=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9Cda7 da8 da9=E2=80=9D. The =
moving around of names caused the
above, which again I=E2=80=99ve seen before, and am fine with.
(Oh, you can see I ran a =E2=80=9Czpool offline -f=E2=80=9D on it most =
recently. But
that was in the list of things I=E2=80=99ve tried that haven=E2=80=99t =
helped.)
Please let me know if someone knows how I=E2=80=99ve gotten to this =
state, and
what I need to do to correct it. What is the "in replacing/spare =
config=E2=80=9D
meaning?
- Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5ED5CB56-2E2A-4D83-8CDA-6D6A0719ED19>