Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:47:04 -0500 From: Andrew Gould <andrewlylegould@gmail.com> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>, John Nielsen <lists@jnielsen.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: maybe OT, but involves OOO its slideshow fmt, ``Impress'' Message-ID: <d356c5630904250547p6e3090a6n21564bd253c8a6c0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090425110859.f52460eb.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20090422072312.GA92118@thought.org> <20090424104852.a092d816.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090424201644.GA69617@thought.org> <200904240438.07178.lists@jnielsen.net> <20090424231843.GA91766@thought.org> <20090425110859.f52460eb.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote: > On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:18:43 -0700, Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> wrote: > > yes, the voices [from audio/festival] are pretty good; i use > > them to read boring stuff > > to me when i'm about brain-dead! but these voices just don't cut > > it given the kind of quasi-poetic stuff i have. > > Wouldn't it be easier to use a natural speaker then? I know there's > no such person in the ports collection... :-) > > This is a very good point. (Especially since Majel Barrett-Roddenberry, voice of the computer in the original tv series of "Star Trek," is no longer with us.) Writings of such a human nature deserve a real human's voice and interpretation.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d356c5630904250547p6e3090a6n21564bd253c8a6c0>