Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:26:52 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, nms@otdel-1.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is there spinlocks/semaphores available for drivers? Message-ID: <200003271826.LAA94885@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2000 10:55:57 MST." <200003271755.KAA26648@nomad.yogotech.com> References: <200003271755.KAA26648@nomad.yogotech.com> <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000327072156.16642A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> <200003271731.JAA41585@apollo.backplane.com> <200003271746.KAA26582@nomad.yogotech.com> <200003271753.JAA41782@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200003271755.KAA26648@nomad.yogotech.com> Nate Williams writes: : Huh? CardBus cards are *not* slow. PCMCIA cards are, but CardBus is : pretty dang fast. The consequence of Matt's position is that cardbus cards won't be able to be in their interrupt handlers at the same time. This will have a small impact on performance, but the cards will still work. Unless I'm misunderstanding Matt's position. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003271826.LAA94885>