Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:27:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Connectivity issues (was Re: FreeBSD 4.3-RC5 now on ftp.freebsd.org) Message-ID: <15076.22538.844522.228526@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <3AE34381.C0F45B4B@softweyr.com> References: <3AE0F244.31D9B307@cvzoom.net> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10104200854050.37148-100000@athena.uniserve.ca> <83033.987782742@critter> <20010421001450.C77032@skriver.dk> <20010420152946.O19393@nexus.root.com> <200104211412.f3LECe859107@harmony.village.org> <3AE34381.C0F45B4B@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Moved to -chat ] Wes Peters writes: > > : That settles it: move the machine to Kansas or Nebraska. 8-) > > > > Actaully, Colorado would have better connectivity than either Kansas > > or Nebraska :-) > > The safest place in the USA, seismically speaking, is northwestern > Missouri. I don't know about their electricity politics, though, > which is rather important, too. Actually, I would have thought that Wisconsin or Minnesota would be more safe, because of the North American granite plate they're sitting on. There's no way an earthquate would shake it, since it would be shaking alot of North America. :) Flooding on the other hand seems to be a problem. :) :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15076.22538.844522.228526>