Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:25:38 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert <gerard@seibercom.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why sendmail? Message-ID: <200609021325.58177.gerard@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <df9ac37c0609020831u317633f8kea66ff44bf58e523@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060901125631.GA92179@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <20060901115919.6B6F.GERARD@seibercom.net> <df9ac37c0609020831u317633f8kea66ff44bf58e523@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1648301.60Ps36Yc9X Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 02 September 2006 11:31, Atom Powers wrote: [...] > By making the Postfix port /not/ disable Sendmail it gives you the > ability to, more easily, run Sendmail *and* Postfix on the same > machine. ie it doesn't break your current configuation. Why would I want Sendmail running in conjunction with a properly functionin= g=20 Postfix installation? I can only imagine problems resulting from such a=20 venture. =2D-=20 Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net The truth about a man lies first and foremost in what he hides. Andre Malraux --nextPart1648301.60Ps36Yc9X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE+b6ls3R1WQUU6lgRAlONAJ0WN8wHMTizQZp9XwH4jselwBsbBACfeN4r 3SgVReKpdcGbFuBZz1S60BM= =zGhW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1648301.60Ps36Yc9X--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200609021325.58177.gerard>