Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Nov 1999 14:41:59 -0500
From:      Mitch Collinsworth <mkc@Graphics.Cornell.EDU>
To:        Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com>
Cc:        matt <matt@BabCom.ORG>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: BIND NXT Bug Vulnerability 
Message-ID:  <199911111942.AA298389320@broccoli.graphics.cornell.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Nov 1999 10:25:39 PST." <Pine.BSF.3.96.991111101516.20225E-100000@java.dpcsys.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>bind builds perfectly from the source.
>
># make stdlinks
># make clean
># make depend
># make all
># make install
>
>Done.  It looks for named.conf in /etc instead of /etc/namedb but we
>have named_flags available or you can just symlink /etc/namedb/named.conf
>to /etc/named.conf which is what I do.
>
>You could also edit src/port/freebsd/Makefile.set and change
>DESTETC to suit.

Does DESTETC really control this?  I was poking around looking for
why it was looking in /etc rather than /etc/namedb and found this.
Then I looked back at my 8.1.2 install which was from the ports and
defaults to /etc/namedb and DESTETC was set to /etc there as well.

Oddly, the default ISC install creates an /etc/namedb/named.conf,
but the named it creates looks for /etc/named.conf.  Weird.

-Mitch



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911111942.AA298389320>