Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:45:46 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpthread Makefile src/lib/libpthread/test sigsuspend_d.c src/lib/libpthread/thread thr_cancel.c thr_concurrency.c thr_create.c thr_find_thread.c thr_init.c thr_kern.c thr_nanosleep.c thr_private.h thr_sig.c thr_sigmask.c... Message-ID: <20030719004546.GA35895@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20030719001523.GA85201@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <3F185DAA.2040208@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10307181657450.1754-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20030719001523.GA85201@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:15:24PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > Who are "the arches"? KSE is a new feature, so the responsibility is on > the KSE developers to complete their implementation on all Tier-1 > platforms. No. If there's not enough support from <arch>-gurus, then <arch> should be bumped down to tier 2. We cannot realisticly require MI developers to know the MD details of all tier 1 platforms. We need to have active maintainers for the MD bits. If they don't exist, then we cannot really support the platform anyway. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030719004546.GA35895>