Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 03:09:18 GMT From: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly) To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Someone needs to re-develop "Softupdates" Message-ID: <35055ca1.137398237@mail.cetlink.net> In-Reply-To: <199803090248.TAA13804@mt.sri.com> References: <19980308191111.08309@mcs.net> <35034f2e.134015736@mail.cetlink.net> <199803090248.TAA13804@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 8 Mar 1998 19:48:56 -0700, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> wrote: >> It's amazing how some of the same people who decry commercializing >> FreeBSD with donor control of funding have no objection to Kirk's >> commercial hooks. > >Sad isn't it.... > >> Score 1 for the GPL. > >The GPL has nothing to do with this. So you say ... >This is simply a commercial entity that has paid Kirk that would like >to not having to re-integrate this into FreeBSD as changes are made. But then you say that? If all FreeBSD was GPLed Kirk could not demand that anyone license softupdates. So why do you say GPL has nothing to do with it? -- Browser war over, Mozilla now free. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35055ca1.137398237>