Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 01:11:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET> To: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org> Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: 4.0-stable, OpenSSH v1 & v2 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005300107260.53243-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca> In-Reply-To: <393349CC.66070C95@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 30 May 2000, Doug Barton wrote: [...] : Think about that for a minute. Do we still want to support FreeBSD : 2.1.x in the ports? Assuming the answer is no, all Kris is saying is : that when we stop supporting 3.x, the openss[hl] ports will disappear. : Please don't overreact. :) When you put it like that, I agree with you. However, when the ports versions are always kept up to date and get updated far quicker than changes merge into the -stable source tree (for obvious reasons, I'm not criticizing that.), I don't see why we should make it difficult for people to use current versions of software. I'm not overreacting or panicing, I'm simply thinking ahead in the future like I always do :) : Doug Matt Heckaman matt@arpa.mail.net http://www.lucida.qc.ca -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp iD8DBQE5M01mdMMtMcA1U5ARApzKAKDc31bcNkFEedp25G6xfQjk+EZgOQCfevvA 0ONNgFvBbuDKF5Aq8noHbuA= =gJwl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0005300107260.53243-100000>