Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:08:04 -0800 From: "Michael C. Shultz" <reso3w83@verizon.net> To: Benjamin Dover <dawgeestyle@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Portmanager output, what's it mean? Message-ID: <200502151508.05088.reso3w83@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <5ae9cd550502151438633b323c@mail.gmail.com> References: <5ae9cd550502151438633b323c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 02:38 pm, Benjamin Dover wrote: > Portmanager finished and I'm not sure what its trying to tell me. Do > I have to manually update gnupg-devel-1.9.14_1 or just run > portmanager again? It made a list of ports and they all showed > current. Here is the output: > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >--- OLD kdeutils-3.3.2 built with old dependency gnupg-1.4.0, current > dependency isgnupg-1.4.0_1 > OLD kde-3.3.2 built with old dependency gnupg-1.4.0, current > dependency is gnupg-1.4.0_1 > OLD gnupg-devel-1.9.14_1 built with old dependency gnupg-1.4.0, > current dependency is gnupg-1.4.0_1 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >--- status report finished > ===================================================================== >=== checkForOldDepencies 0.2.6_5 skip: kdeutils-3.3.2 has a dependency > gnupg-devel-1.9.14_1 that needs to be updated first > checkForOldDepencies 0.2.6_5 skip: kde-3.3.2 has a dependency > gnupg-devel-1.9.14_1 that needs to be updated first > checkForOldDepencies 0.2.6_5 skip: gnupg-devel-1.9.14_1 has a > dependency gnupg-devel-1.9.14_1 that needs to be updated first > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >--- update of ports collection complete with either some errors, > ignored ports or both > ===================================================================== please send me the output of portmanager -u >& portmanager.log (send to ringworm01@gmail.com) right now I am guessing gnupg-1.4.0 failed to build but it should have explicitly reported that fact, so maybe there is a bug here. -Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502151508.05088.reso3w83>