Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:51:33 +0100 (CET)
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
To:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: leaked swap?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903191445340.44620@mail.fig.ol.no>
In-Reply-To: <20190319130221.GB6462@zxy.spb.ru>
References:  <9c5eaa94-f55b-464a-ab0f-267e7fce4bd0@FreeBSD.org> <CA%2BK5SrPFgYMqR9DpBqjHBtSu987JGjCwpqeRWFzuoNM=jiE7ug@mail.gmail.com> <f18c5c2c-3cc8-ae76-9d8b-694d7c0ee873@FreeBSD.org> <20190319130221.GB6462@zxy.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:02+0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:00:10PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> 
> > On 18/03/2019 20:01, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
> > > Not this? ZFS use wired and not clean only reboot?
> > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7538?id=25108
> > 
> > Wired memory surely has nothing to do with swap.
> 
> Wired memory can pressure to swapable memory

I've noticed setting vm.pageout_update_period=0 in /etc/sysctl.conf 
eliminated excessive swapping, effectively disabling r334154.

Maybe this is irrelevant. I waited a while before mentioning this. 
Response times of idle services skyrocketed in my case.

-- 
Trond.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903191445340.44620>