Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 01:33:35 -0800 From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ctau ctau.c Message-ID: <404AEC6F.5070103@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20040306114857.jdp@polstra.com> References: <XFMail.20040306114857.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Polstra wrote:
> On 05-Mar-2004 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>
>>John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>>
>>>"Fix tinderbox builds" doesn't imply that the tinderbox itself is broken and
>>>that's not the impression I got at all when I read it. We all know what the
>>>tinderbox is and the value of its service (such as finding glitches like
>>>above). Please don't be so touchy about anything which mentions tinderbox
>>>assuming that it's being slammed when it's not.
>>
>>well, given the number of "this works fine here, what is the tinderbox
>>doing wrong" comments I get...
>
>
> I am totally sympathetic to your position, DES! It took me about
> 5 years to stop getting pissed off about all the "Latest CVSup is
> totally broken!" subject lines that were actually referring to state
> of the FreeBSD source tree.
Same problem here with mergemaster, but I decided to learn from your
example John, and not get pissed off about it in the first place. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?404AEC6F.5070103>