Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 11:00:42 -0500 From: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett A. Wollman), current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent changes to `dump' Message-ID: <9511291600.AA06049@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <199511290744.IAA14116@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <9511281946.AA04068@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <199511290744.IAA14116@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 29 Nov 1995 08:44:01 +0100 (MET), J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> said: > It has not added a qualifier. Here's the diff: > If you really think that omitting the additional (and apparently > accidental) ``DUMP:'' does confuse the world, so remove _just this_, > instead of shooting around and removing everything from this patch. > Remember, there was a general consensus to _include_ the `throughput' > line. > What does amanda say to the new dump? Well, let's put it this way. I jumped a little to a conclusion. Amanda hates the new format. I looked at the part of the code that parses the dump output, found a reasonable-looking format line, and compared it to dump's output. I then deleted the word `tape' and all of my backups worked. ``You be the judge.'' -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9511291600.AA06049>