Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:20:10 +0100
From:      void <void@f-m.fm>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: filemon
Message-ID:  <ZqkEqkzANCev2Rye@int21h>
In-Reply-To: <20240730235707.312d5493197351c9f7e8e649@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
References:  <ZqT6_a_0F8DCUsBm@int21h> <CAFDf7UKxhSu%2BqMGV1KahrSX9ho8vFut4avxNVX4D8QGa6%2B%2BTjQ@mail.gmail.com> <20240727170122.675f6bfe@ernst.home> <865xsn6ya9.fsf@ltc.des.dev> <a5471d18-7f88-4e24-8518-2c7a67ddd7f1@quip.cz> <D9B5CEBB-3AD3-4D0B-AFD5-33CB5EE0207B@riseup.net> <20240730235707.312d5493197351c9f7e8e649@dec.sakura.ne.jp>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 11:57:07PM +0900, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:

>Another aspect is that loading multiple too large modules easily makes
>boots crash. Staging area (memory region which loader allocates to load
>kernel and modules, and maybe configured buffers) is limited.

This is why I went looking for filemon as kernel device in the manpage initially.
Generally, in the kernel config I'll comment out stuff thats not going to be used
and add stuff i know is needed, instead of using loader.conf or other methods.
-- 


help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZqkEqkzANCev2Rye>