Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:58:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Igor Shmukler <shmukler@mail.ru> Cc: jgordeev@dir.bg, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[4]: vkernel & GSoC, some questions Message-ID: <200803172158.m2HLwPSI021438@apollo.backplane.com> References: <200803170012.m2H0C02i009972@apollo.backplane.com> <E1Jb5sQ-000Fju-00.shmukler-mail-ru@f69.mail.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:Matt,
:
:You sure won't argue that UML isolation is inherently better than one that can be provided by a hypervisor. If the performance is the same, what are you gaining?
:
:Hypervisor while slow, allows treating a complete OS with all applications as a black box. Why would I choose UML over a hypervisor?
:
:I am not trying to say there cannot be a place for vkernel. [I don't even yet understand what is does or how.] However, as a hosting company, why would I choose UML over a hypervisor?
:
:...
:
:igor
Well, whos hypervisor are you using?
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200803172158.m2HLwPSI021438>