Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:02:28 -0700 From: Will Froning <wfroning@pacific.edu>(by way of Will Froning <wfroning@pacific.edu>) To: Paul Saab <ps@mu.org> Subject: Re: 4.6.2-p23 and [tcp bad cksum] Message-ID: <20031002140228.679892a6.wfroning@pacific.edu> Resent-Message-ID: <20031002140818.10a86995.wfroning@pacific.edu> In-Reply-To: <20031002205137.GA30467@elvis.mu.org> References: <20031002133634.716f25e2.wfroning@pacific.edu> <20031002204821.GA30153@elvis.mu.org> <20031002135014.34a4e129.wfroning@pacific.edu> <20031002205137.GA30467@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Which is which? The 2 boxes that didn't work, one had a Fiber EM and the other had a copper BGE running at 100 full (Dell 1650 and 2550 respectively) The 4.9-pre is a Fiber EM (dell 2600). > Which one was causing large amount of checksum errors? Both of the 4.6.2 boxes. > Which one fixed it? etc etc etc etc. Upgrading the 4.6.2 boxes to 4.8 fixed the problem allowed the messages to pass through. Although I didn't record a tcpdump when it started working, as it scrolled by I noticed a reduction in the number of errors. Shoot me an e-mail if you need more info. Thanks, Will > Will Froning (wfroning@pacific.edu) wrote: > > one was copper BGE the other a Fiber EM. > > > > Will > > > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 13:48:21 -0700 > > Paul Saab <ps@mu.org> wrote: > > > > > What NIC? > > > > > > -- > > Will Froning > > Unix Sys. Admin. > > (209)946-7470 > > (209)662-4725 > > wfroning@pacific.edu > > > > -- > -ps -- Will Froning Unix Sys. Admin. (209)946-7470 (209)662-4725 wfroning@pacific.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031002140228.679892a6.wfroning>