Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:51:00 +0000 (GMT) From: "Mark Powell" <M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk> To: Jaz <jaz99@optusnet.com.au> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS + Samba/NFS = ugh Message-ID: <20071108164747.T57083@rust.salford.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <00e301c820d2$be015b00$7a9da705@bastardx2> References: <31796970.30371187974660912.JavaMail.root@zmail.illuminati.org><fan8p8$3p1$1@sea.gmane.org><20070824200726.GA66242@idoru.cepheid.org> <790a9fff0708241424r44517517h357318b8a2004982@mail.gmail.com> <00e301c820d2$be015b00$7a9da705@bastardx2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Jaz wrote: >> where it was found to be caused by lseek behaving differently on ZFS: >> >> And one person found a work arround for ZFS by removing the >> repdir_get* sources from samba: > > So has anything changed since then? ZFS + Samba seems to be working fine for > me. The problem was with Samba 3.0.25 and non-ufs fs. In the current version in ports, 3.0.26, samba seems to have some special coding specifically for zfs. Which means the previous tricks to get it working are no longer needed. I've not checked whether it also fixes the problem on other non-ufs fs e.g. msdosfs, but all is well for zfs. Cheers. -- Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford Information Services Division, Clifford Whitworth Building, Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 4837 Fax: +44 161 295 5888 www.pgp.com for PGP key
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071108164747.T57083>