Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 15:56:49 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, core@freebsd.org, muir@idiom.com Subject: Re: bin/1019 Message-ID: <199604182156.PAA01493@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199604182136.BAA00940@astral.msk.su> References: <199604182116.XAA02674@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199604182136.BAA00940@astral.msk.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > dialer?), but the reason that some PPP packages don't understand a > > regular Unix login sequence but wanna use PAP or CHAP instead doesn't > > sound totally unreasonable. At least, everything is hidden inside a > > If you use PAP/CHAP only, don't even start getty over this line, > just start pppd on it directly. What happens if that modem isn't a dedicated modem, and can be used by non-PPP users? Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604182156.PAA01493>