Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Jun 2020 15:03:15 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org>,  src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>,  svn-src-head <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r362444 - head/sbin/dump
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfo73KmTHNo6zjUYLZKi=qcW1SnFTeM5hNiRVyJiT=8FTg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200620201934.GA8270@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202006202006.05KK6EqK016498@repo.freebsd.org> <01000172d35c996f-523a3c65-2f6b-472e-ad04-070e2b22bfe0-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20200620201934.GA8270@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 2:19 PM Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 08:12:40PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote:
> > Thanks for backing this out, Warner.
>
> I also appreciate it.
>

You bet. I had enough people send me dispassionate context around to
realize that minion was no longer a hill worth dying on. While it wasn't
problematic in the way slave was, it had other issues my pre-commit
research completely was blind to...


> > I'd like to change "slave" to "worker" here (which I think is a
> reasonably
> > neutral and entirely inoffensive term), and in the process perhaps make
> some
> > associated grammatical changes (since "enworker" is dubious at best).
> >
> > To avoid causing any further issues: If anyone objects to the word
> "worker"
> > please let me know in the next ~48 hours.  I think there's enough people
> > reading svn-src-all that I can anticipate feedback now if anyone will
> care
> > deeply about that word.
>
> Please, just open a DR for that so all interested parties can participate
> and fine-tune particular grammar and language choices.  Also, r362447
> should be reverted on the same grounds as r362422.
>

I'd have rather r362447 go through review as well, but really, it's fine
enough for now that it's not worth the churn to back it out.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfo73KmTHNo6zjUYLZKi=qcW1SnFTeM5hNiRVyJiT=8FTg>