Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:01:21 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Dirk Gouders <gouders@et.bocholt.fh-ge.de> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Include files that depend on include files Message-ID: <20050809220121.GB15004@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <200508092149.j79Lnvn8013382@sora.hank.home> References: <200508092149.j79Lnvn8013382@sora.hank.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:49:57PM +0200, Dirk Gouders wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I am currently playing with the KLD facility on a 4.11-STABLE system > and noticed that there are some include files that need other files > included before them, e.g. sys/module.h and sys/linker.h cannot be > preprocessed/compiled without including other necessary files before > them. >=20 > Is that intentional? And if yes, is there a difference of such > a "rule" between "kernel include files" and those that are normally > included in "user space code"? This is intentational. We try to avoid having headers bring in more then absolutly required when included. I'm not sure what your second question means. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC+SexXY6L6fI4GtQRAtTsAKDDJghv7sMY2PmZHaBKDDwYOt2YgQCfcytK MYX/qfqM2/oVgawtC5v+WqE= =0+dk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050809220121.GB15004>