Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 16:05:52 +0000 From: Anatoly Vorobey <mellon@pobox.com> To: Heikki Paatela <paatela@st.jyu.fi> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: M$ one-ups UNIX??? Message-ID: <20000303160552.A61072@happy.checkpoint.com> In-Reply-To: <20000302123251.B23719@silmu.st.jyu.fi>; from paatela@st.jyu.fi on Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 12:32:51PM %2B0200 References: <20000302014342.B327@marder-1> <Pine.NEB.3.96.1000301225919.16032B-100000@shell-1.enteract.com> <20000302123251.B23719@silmu.st.jyu.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 12:32:51PM +0200, Heikki Paatela wrote: > > Seems that man-page from 2.1.7.1-RELEASE still says: > "HISTORY > A ln command appeared in Version 6 AT&T UNIX." > but 2.2.1 says: > "HISTORY > A ln command appeared in Version 1 AT&T UNIX." > > NetBSD man-pages still say that it appeared in Version 6 - so I am wondering > which one is correct? From the revision history in CVS: 1.3 log @[HISTORY] command appeared in Version 1 AT&T UNIX Obtained from: A Quarter Century of UNIX, Peter H. Salus, page 41 @ The change occurred between 2.1.7 and 2.2.0. -- Anatoly Vorobey, mellon@pobox.com http://pobox.com/~mellon/ "Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly" - G.K.Chesterton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000303160552.A61072>