Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:44:23 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about iSCSI Message-ID: <gvgv7v$vs4$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <ba4aa9cb0905250833m45d609ddk4b5e40c097cba94c@mail.gmail.com> References: <ba4aa9cb0905250630l7f06c319vf144fd5609e025f0@mail.gmail.com> <200905251056.09987.lists@jnielsen.net> <ba4aa9cb0905250833m45d609ddk4b5e40c097cba94c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Francisco Cabrita wrote: > Avoiding iSCSI it's a nice possibility but, on this new scenario the volumes > are exported to both w2k PDC and w2k BDC. My client relies upon a very > granular permission scheme. I don't know if I can handle this without a NTFS > volume. (If I'm not wrong, we can't format a NTFS partition under FreeBSD) No, and it wouldn't be of any use to you since Samba would still see it as a POSIX file system. OTOH, Samba has some rudimentary support for ACLs (it's a built-time option) and UFS2 has ACL support by default, though it needs to be enabled in fstab (see mount(8)), so depending on how convoluted are your requirements, it might or might not work. See for example: http://aisalen.wordpress.com/2007/08/10/acls-on-samba/ [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkocAEcACgkQldnAQVacBchc5ACg9Te9NSuTeFKq56ZVtjqPhYu8 6OYAoIHB5L1LNGBEaDQFYU37BlImTjCw =h4rm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?gvgv7v$vs4$1>