Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:13:35 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?] Message-ID: <200410201913.42879.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20041020170907.GA1216@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <41767CF1.2020005@FreeBSD.org> <20041020.105839.100358845.imp@bsdimp.com> <20041020170907.GA1216@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Why is this discussion ongoing? The consensus seems pretty clear: "Implement it, but have a make.conf option to turn it off." If there is concern with this make if default to off and have an option to turn it on. I don't see the point in exchanging details on how cheap or expensive disk space or admin time is these days. -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBdpzGXyyEoT62BG0RAqQBAJ48AwPCURpk44AhqxytnkPIOqwqeQCdG/GV ORRYjguDmE7Oh/Lmdw+5W4M= =Pffp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410201913.42879.max>