Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:10:49 +0100 From: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot@poupinou.org> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at> Subject: Re: ACPI throttling changes Message-ID: <20031211181049.GA3872@poupinou.org> In-Reply-To: <20031210100527.X46577@root.org> References: <20031209175230.I44055@root.org> <20031210184201.Y598@korben.in.tern> <20031210100527.X46577@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:06:45AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > I'm working on a shared CPU frequency control driver. One step is to > > > remove some of the autonomy of the throttling portion of acpi_cpu. > > > Please test this patch if you have a machine which supports throttling. > > > > Apropos CPU frequency: is there a way to find out at what frequency the > > CPU is running? And shouldn't SpeedStep have an influence on that? (Or > > is SpeedStep not supported?) > > This is getting a bit off-topic. It's too early to discuss how all the > different parts of cpufreq work. The answer is "yes and no", depending on > which underlying technologies your laptop has available. ACPI throttling: > yes, SpeedStep: mostly yes, ACPI performance states: no. ACPI performance states (IO only though) should be ok, no? -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031211181049.GA3872>