Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Apr 2007 03:59:24 +0200
From:      Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
To:        Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
Message-ID:  <200704090359.30493.max@love2party.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070409010703.GA74547@garage.freebsd.pl>
References:  <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> <20070408185312.GY63916@garage.freebsd.pl> <20070409010703.GA74547@garage.freebsd.pl>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Monday 09 April 2007 03:07, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:53:12PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > fzap_upgrade() changes type from 'zap_micro' to 'zap_fat' and union
> > is used for this (see
> > sys/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zap_impl.h), that's why
> > we see this trash:
> >
> > zap_num_entries_mtx = {lock_object = {lo_name = 0x70000 <Address
> > 0x70000 out of bounds>, lo_type = 0x0, lo_flags = 2155822976,
> > lo_witness_data = {lod_list = {stqe_next = 0x0}, lod_witness = 0x0}},
> > sx_lock = 1, sx_recurse = 0},
> >
> > I already use kmem_zalloc() (note _z_) for zap allocation in
> > zap_micro.c, so Max is right, that we have to clear this structure
> > here.
> >
> > I'm quite tired of tracking such problems, because our mechanism for
> > detecting already initialized locks is too simple (based on one bit),
> > so I'd prefer to improve it, or just add bzero() to mutex_init().
>
> I just committed a fix. Now I do 13 bits check for already initialized
> locks detection instead of standard 1 bit check. Could you repeat your
> test?

Will do tomorrow.  Thanks.

-- 
/"\  Best regards,                      | mlaier@freebsd.org
\ /  Max Laier                          | ICQ #67774661
 X   http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/  | mlaier@EFnet
/ \  ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBGGZ4CXyyEoT62BG0RAsrPAJ4wzq6erlw5IQRpsViAS3uqDm9nKwCfRBvT
hmrRGWrdDA2eCrEF8WeBIzE=
=ujZh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200704090359.30493.max>