Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 07:48:01 -0400 (EDT) From: mwlucas@exceptionet.com To: delta@xti.org (Terje Elde) Cc: mwlucas@exceptionet.com, jascha@equilibrate.net, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VPN/Secure Tunnel Message-ID: <199907151148.HAA18635@easeway.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907150917190.5308-100000@mordor.xti.org> from Terje Elde at "Jul 15, 99 09:18:04 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've never tried to integrate SKIP with IPSec, so I'm not the one to talk about this. I do know that SKIP does not work behind a NAT, however. Check out www.skip.org; there's a link there for the SKIP mailing list. The NAT/SKIP issue has been beaten to death there. Good luck, ==ml > On Wed, 14 Jul 1999 mwlucas@exceptionet.com wrote: > > >If the firewall is not a NAT, use SKIP (/usr/ports/security/skip). > > > >Very nice, solid, and reliable, and there's even a Windows client if you > >have to add others later. > > >From what I've been told, SKIP is IPSec compatible if you do the keying > manyally, is that correct? Also, any way to get SKIP to work through a NAT > box? -- Michael Lucas | Exceptionet, Inc. | www.exceptionet.com "Exceptional Networking" | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907151148.HAA18635>