Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:50:30 -0400 From: "Michael W. Lucas" <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml Message-ID: <20050513185030.GA83749@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> In-Reply-To: <20050512222200.1FBFA5D07@ptavv.es.net> References: <20050512213507.GB43447@cell.sick.ru> <20050512222200.1FBFA5D07@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:22:00PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On the other hand, ACPI seems to work fine on my 600E these days, > although I'll admit that I don't pull it out of the drawer very > often. ACPI didn't work in the past, though. > > Maybe: > <para>FreeBSD supports <acronym>APM</acronym> on certain machines. > Please look in the <filename>LINT</filename> (V4.x or the > <filename>NOTES</filename> (V5.x) kernel config file, > searching for the <acronym>APM</acronym> keyword. Further > information can be found in &man.apm.4;.</para> > > <para>FreeBSD 5.X and later support the > <acronym>ACPI</acronym> features found in most modern > hardware. Further information can be found in > &man.acpi.4;. If a system supports both > <acronym>APM</acronym> and <acronym>ACPI</acronym>, either > can be used. You will probably want to try both and use the > one which works best for your system. > </para> > > In any case, the word "supports" in the second paragraph should be > changed to "support" for proper agreement with the subject. Thanks for the wordage, I changed the Q&A. -- Michael W. Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ "The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring." -Non Sequitur
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050513185030.GA83749>