Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 06:59:09 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, nork@FreeBSD.org, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r189765 - in head: . lib/libc lib/libc/nls Message-ID: <20090314065909.85bd441f.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903131607250.6590@thor.farley.org> References: <200903131040.n2DAecSO061131@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903130910540.4522@thor.farley.org> <20090313182216.GA8844@zim.MIT.EDU> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903131331320.6076@thor.farley.org> <20090314060159.c508619b.nork@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903131607250.6590@thor.farley.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi Sean! On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:12:00 -0500 (CDT) "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> functionality, however, the Citrus website is ambiguous about the > >> license. > > Really? > ambigous > > Citrus is licensed under BSD License or variant (like > > Perl or MIT). It can use with (L)GPL. > > WWW: http://citrus.bsdclub.org/ > OK. Technically, the website is not ambiguous. It is the license that > is ambiguous. :) At least, they claim it is: Ah, OK. They, Citrus developers, consider that it is licensed under BSD License on *BSD, at least. In fact, on NetBSD/OpenBSD, it is licensed under BSD License, and we can use it under BSD License. But it may be used on other environment like X. So it is licensed under dual(multiple?) license.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090314065909.85bd441f.nork>