Date: Tue, 24 Jan 1995 13:35:47 -0800 (PST) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul Richards) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com, kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de Subject: Re: disklabel (1.1.5.1), partitions Message-ID: <199501242135.NAA22166@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199501242018.UAA01237@isl.cf.ac.uk> from "Paul Richards" at Jan 24, 95 08:18:20 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > > >2117025 1819 cyl 15 heads 77 sec > > > > > Does anybody have anything remotely close to a good reason for not nuking > > the above printf in sd.c and always report a 32/64/X geometry ?? > > > > I dislike the idea. If you think the reported disk geometry is causing > support hassles then just don't report it, don't pretend the disk > reported something else instead even if that's what we use:-) Exactly, I didn't intend to print it, only to stick it in the default disklabel. -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> TRW Financial Systems, Inc. FreeBSD has, until now, not one single time had an undetected error. :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199501242135.NAA22166>