Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 07:15:04 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsdtar POLA change in 10.0? Message-ID: <1394111704.25672.91302321.2D5C71E3@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <op.xcaxml0kkndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local> References: <53171DAE.5070203@li.ru> <1394110822.21224.91297125.0B659AFB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <op.xcaxml0kkndu52@ronaldradial.radialsg.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014, at 7:12, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:00:22 +0100, Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014, at 6:50, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: > >> I wonder why > >> > >> bsdtar --one-file-system > >> > >> suddenly started to skip archiving of mount-points? And no mention of > >> such behaviour change either in UPDATING or errata :( > >> > > > > --one-file-system > > (c, r, and u modes) Do not cross mount points. > > > > Isn't that what it's supposed to do? Skip any mounted filesystems? Was > > it broken before? Or do I simply not understand the behavior you're > > seeing. > > The question is if the mountpoint (directory in the 'current' filesystem) > itself should be tarred. After untarring you can than make the same > mounts > again, for example. > So you're saying that if I have a disk mounted at /mnt/disk and my tar with --one-file-system includes /mnt, the empty directory /mnt/disk will not be in the tarball?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1394111704.25672.91302321.2D5C71E3>